Yeah, I know, Ken. I'm a lousy businessman. :-)
I guess this is ancient technology, too.
<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/pklein/friends/karina1stbday/P3290018.jpg.html>
I just photographed her first birthday party this weekend. She's only 3
months younger than my E-M5.
--Peter
I sez:
> > I sincerely hope our beloved Olympus does not withhold what amounts
to a
> > bug fix from last year's Incredible New Thing so that I will feel
> > compelled to ditch it and buy this year's Incredible New Thing.
Because
> > I may not fall for it. (And yes, when an otherwise marvelous camera
> > blurs pictures in the range where most handheld shots are taken, I
call
> > that a bug).
>
So Ken Norton sez:
> 1. I highly doubt that Olympus would consider it a bug.
>
> 2. The E-M5 is ancient technology and fully abandoned at this point.
> Olympus is in the business of selling NEW cameras. Not making you like
> your old one more. I believe I have sufficient history on my side to
> back up this statement.
>
> 3. EFC is a patented technology that I do not believe Olympus owns.
> They paid for the licensing of it in the E-M1, but not the E-M5. The
> only reason why the E-M1 didn't have it originally was because of a
> bug which needed addressing, but couldn't be allowed to hold up
> production.
>
>
> --
> Ken Norton
> ken [at] zone-10.com
> http://www.zone-10.com
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
