Yeah, but nothing too long term, it has to be built before the next election
!
...Wayne
>
> I'd bet against it. We are addicted to big project thinking. Here we've
just
> invested heavily in huge and massively expensive desalination projects
when
> the sensible thing to my POV would be to build a highly diffused network
of
> small and even domestic level purification plants and recycling
facilities,
> especially considering that the overwhelming proportion of water that we
> use does not have to be drinkable or even clean. But there is no value in
that
> for government, construction and employment in the big ticket, banner
> headline, short term approach that we seem to prefer.
> Andrew Fildes
> afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> www.soultheft.com
>
> Author/Publisher:
> The SLR Compendium:
> revised edition -
> http://blur.by/19Hb8or
> The TLR Compendium
> http://blur.by/1eDpqN7
>
>
>
> On 26/03/2014, at 1:38 AM, Scott Gomez wrote:
>
> > Using shipboard/submarine nuclear propulsion plants would be a step
> towards
> > the small, local power distribution and power plant design that really
> > seems to make more and more sense the more I look at it. And, as
> mentioned
> > by some others, there's the option of small thorium reactors.
>
> --
> __________________________________________________________
> _______
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|