I think perhaps only our expectations were different. If I were to use
the image I'd want that halo totally gone whether it was purple or gray.
Chuck Norcutt
On 2/22/2014 5:26 PM, DZDub wrote:
> The web image at 100% looked better to me. The purple is gone. Did I
> claim more than that?
>
> I thought it might demonstrate that Tina could possibly get a better result
> using PS instead of LR. I would have thought the tools were the same, but
> I don't have a copy of LR to compare it to.
>
> Joel W.
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Chuck Norcutt <
> chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I don't see that it delivers the result you say it does. Only if the
>> "purple hue" sliders are set to the extremes (1 and 99) does the purple
>> fringe get totally desatured. But the (now gray) halo is not
>> eliminated, and furthermore, there is a deleterious effect on other
>> background colors.
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>>
>> On 2/22/2014 2:36 PM, DZDub wrote:
>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Tina Manley <images@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The Remove Chromatic Aberration button in LR did not work on this one:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/154578993
>>>>
>>>
>>> I saved it to my desktop, browsed it in Bridge, and the selected File >
>>> Open in Camera Raw and used the lens correction tool there. Slide the
>>> purple slider to 10 and the fringe is gone.
>>>
>>> Joel W.
>>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|