Subject: | Re: [OM] E-M5 EVF delay, again |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 15 Feb 2014 10:21:09 -0500 |
See my response to peter re: simple human response time. Chuck Norcutt On 2/15/2014 4:00 AM, Nathan Wajsman wrote: > A camera with the characteristics you describe would be utterly > useless to me. Many of the scenes I photograph do not stay still long > enough for a 1/4 sec. delay (EVF+shutter shock, as you say below). > > My prejudices against cameras with no optical finder continue to be > confirmed. > > Cheers, Nathan > > Nathan Wajsman -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] E-M5 EVF delay, again, Chuck Norcutt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Full list of cameras supported by the current version of ACR ( 8.3), Chuck Norcutt |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] E-M5 EVF delay, again, Ken Norton |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] E-M5 EVF delay, again, Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |