Subject: | Re: [OM] swans |
---|---|
From: | Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 15 Feb 2014 16:14:03 +1100 |
Exactly. The biggest form it comes in is a Chateaubriand - my idea of the perfect steak - but nowhere near that weight and usually eaten by two. Delicately. Andrew Fildes afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx www.soultheft.com Author/Publisher: The SLR Compendium: revised edition - http://blur.by/19Hb8or The TLR Compendium http://blur.by/1eDpqN7 On 15/02/2014, at 10:26 AM, Moose wrote: > On 2/11/2014 2:39 PM, Paul Laughlin wrote: >> Here you go: >> <http://bigtexan.com/72-oz-steak/> > > I believe he refers to the misuse of 'filet mignon'. > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filet_mignon> > > I'm not sure even Paul Bunyan's ox, Babe, could produce a 72 oz. filet mignon. > > Dainty Moose > > -- > What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about? > -- > _________________________________________________________________ > Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus > Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ > Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ > > -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] IMG: 43 year's worth, Moose |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Brand Shift - The Sequel, Nathan Wajsman |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] swans, Moose |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] swans, Paul Laughlin |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |