Thanks, David, but I don't understand "compiled derivative". Does that
imply that DCRAW is only available as source code? In what sense is
UFRAW a derivative and why is it necessary to state that it's compiled?
Chuck Norcutt
On 2/14/2014 10:55 AM, David Thatcher wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:33:03AM -0500, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>> So, at the moment, it appears that my camera trading is going to be
>> restricted to whatever is supported in CS6. Beyond that I may still be
>> forced to pay the tax (whatever it is at the time) or find another raw
>> processor (if it exists then) that's as good as ACR.
>>
>> ps: My parting words to the rep were that he had just lost a customer.
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>
> Chuck,
>
> It may be worth keeping an eye on Dave Coffin's DCRAW and the compiled
> derivative, UFRAW (both free software). It may not be native for your
> editor (unless you use The GIMP), but will preprocess for you with a few
> different standard output formats (which I assume can be imported to
> your fave editor), and you can apply some basic filtering and curve
> adaptions (which *I think* you can set and forget if you want).
>
> I have found from experience that later revisions quite happily
> understand EM-5 .ORF output. :)
>
> davidt
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|