Subject: | Re: [OM] Mirrorless doomed? |
---|---|
From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 2 Jan 2014 16:36:42 -0600 |
> Just exactly where are these phones that take "high quality photos?" > > It's not phones that kill anything, its sinking standards. Phones are hi > quality like pocket instamatics. Agreed. I haven't done my calculations of pictures taken in 2013 yet. Probably will this evening. It's been a VERY down year for me in this regard. But it would be safe to say that around half my pictures in 2013 were taken with the cell phone. Almost all of the rest taken with the Panasonic DMC-L1 with the Eye-Fi card in it and most of those pictures were transmitted to either the iPad or the cellphone for upload to social media sites. -- Ken Norton ken@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.zone-10.com -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Mirrorless doomed?, Bill Pearce |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OT: I've retired, Chuck Norcutt |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Mirrorless doomed?, Bill Pearce |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Weather, Chris Trask |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |