Each of those is rather yummy, Bob, especially the one with the twinkles
through the chair slats.
Chris
On 20 Dec 2013, at 12:46, Bob Whitmire <bwhitmire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Wrong kind of sun. <g> But excellent shots nevertheless. And no, it would not
> help to crop the almost-sun out of the edge because it gives a certain scope
> and directionality of light that otherwise would have been missing. But you
> knew that.
>
> But I was thinking of an already risen, non-diffused sun more than a gooch
> above the horizon.
>
> For example:
>
> Eric's Dock, New Harbor, Nikkor 210mm on Cambo 4x5, Velvia 50.
>
> http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=10169
>
> True, not a Fuji. But I took it because of the shots below. Note how washed
> out the Nikkor shot is compared with the Fuji shots below. Fuji can be quirky
> at times (not that there's anything wrong with that), but the 90mm and 65mm
> lenses mounted on the GWS series, i.e., the Texas Leicas, were two of the
> best ever, bar none.
>
> Good Light at Pemaquid, shot with Fuji GSW 690 with 65mm Fuji lens, Velvia 50.
>
> http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=10175
>
> And this one, Pemaquid Sun, again with the Fuji and Velvia 50.
>
> http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=10172
>
> I would not try any of these shots with a digital camera unless I had a dense
> ND filter on it, and maybe not even then. While I hate to agree with AG about
> anything <g>, film tends to work best for these kinds of shots.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|