Subject: | Re: [OM] Dr. Flash asks a flash question |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 14 Dec 2013 09:13:32 -0500 |
Minimum ND level is greater than what I need. Also very expensive. It would require an 82mm filter to completely cover the flash window of a T-32. Dr. Flash On 12/14/2013 8:30 AM, Chris Trask wrote: >> >> Anybody have any suggestions on how to cut the light output of a T-32 in >> full power manual mode by 1/2 stop? Using the low power setting on a >> T-32 drops the output by 2 stops. Using a filter holder and a T-32 ND4 >> filter also drops it by 2 stops while the ND8 drops it by 4 stops. >> >> I can't use auto or TTL modes so have to figure out how to throttle it >> back in manual mode. I've thought about using some sort of ND gel >> filter but these things tend to cost more than the present value of a >> T-32. I've thought of sprinkling little stick-on black dots over the >> surface to block the light but don't know how well that would work. Any >> blockage needs to be distributed over the surface fairly evenly since I >> don't want to block the angle of coverage. Maybe a layer or two of >> exposed B&W film? What can you suggest that I haven't already thought of? >> > > Looks like a great opportunity to use one of those variable neutral > density filters. You could experiment using a pair of linear polarisers to > see if one will do the job for you. > > > Chris > -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Too close to home, Chris Trask |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Too close to home, Chris Trask |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Dr. Flash asks a flash question, Chris Trask |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Dr. Flash asks a flash question, Mark Marr-Lyon |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |