| Subject: | Re: [OM] Why I still shoot film |
|---|---|
| From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 11 Dec 2013 12:18:24 -0800 |
On 12/11/2013 7:35 AM, philippe.amard wrote: > What matters is that the L1 was manipulated by a non digital operator > I presume. And I presume he used his fingers. Dactyl Moose -- What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about? -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Direct/Reflect Leaves, Ken Norton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Why I still shoot film, philippe.amard |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Why I still shoot film, philippe.amard |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Why I still shoot film, philippe.amard |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |