How can you say such a thing on this list ;-) I don't think it has ever
been eclipsed by anything else, and everyone knows it was the sharpest
lens tested by NASA. I want to see proof that has has been eclipsed and
by what - no on second thoughts I don't because whatever it is it will
be very expensive :-)
I know this list wanders off topic most times now but we still love our
OM's don't we and if we don't defend them who will? ;-)
BTW I don't own the 250/2 but opted for a 180/2 and here is my most
memorable shot with it - hope the link works the image is of two "birds"
<http://thattimeoflife.smugmug.com/Portfolio/2010-Few-Fotos-For-Fun/i-mxmJg56/A>
Oly E3 and OM180/2
P.S. I think John sent an OM4Ti into space
On 04/12/2013 14:26, Sawyer, Edward wrote:
> John Hermanson sold a couple of those not long ago. One went to David, a
> list member. I think prices were in the $2500-3k range.
>
> A neat lens, unique in it's length and whatnot, but eclipsed from an
> image-making standpoint by the offerings from Canon and others. And
> somewhat overpriced as a collector lens, due to it's scarcity.
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|