On 11/18/2013 5:13 PM, usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
> ...
>
> Hah, exactly right, 3 shots about 30 sec apart. Perhaps they are
> members of the Bob collective. I see them perfectly positioned in some
> of his exqusite prints.
I would never accuse Bob of such a thing, but I believe Moose may have, at some
time or another, moved a bird to a more
felicitous location in an image. :-)
> I didn't have quite enough shutter speed it turned out when looked at
> at a larger viewing size but knowing the direction
> of motion and using deconvolution out to wazoo rendered the tiny beasty
> good 'nough. It will not hold hold up
> to 400% viewing with ringing and other artifacts, but that is beyond
> what even Moose would consider reasonable pixel peeping.
I've never seen what advantage there is in viewing at more than 100%. I go
above 100% for greater control when doing
very fine editing of a complex edge - and that's very, very seldom, and not
really viewing.
> (though I do enjoy and benefit from his comments when he does Pixel P)
Thanks!
> ...
> (PS, Marnie has an eye on your wave curl print in metal for a room we have
> to do over)
Is that Light Wave? My print is non metallic (hangs head).
100% Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|