Yes, that would work, Philippe, but it would be a different sense: unable to
hear versus just not having heard.
Chris
On 20 Nov 13, at 20:21, philippe.amard <philippe.amard@xxxxxx> wrote:
> couldn't?
>
> ph
>
> Le 20 nov. 13 à 21:17, Chris Barker a écrit :
>
>> , '“He loved you,” she said, hoping Sue didn’t hear her.'
>>
>> That should read, '. . . hadn't heard . . . '
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|