I think "better" was unnecessary. They looked fine to me.
Chuck Norcutt
On 11/3/2013 4:22 PM, Moose wrote:
> On 11/3/2013 6:00 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>> It was nice to have f/2 available.
> I took a couple zoomed in closer, but the shutter speeds got too slow - a bit
> fuzzy.
>
> Had I known that the presentation by a much less photogenic old guy would
> include such photogenic subjects, I'd have had
> the Panny 20/1.7 on E-PM2. Less cropping on a better sensor with good high
> ISO.
>
> Still, the camera you have with you is better ... And I got what I needed.
>
> Front Row Moose
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|