I like the second, closer one. More intimate expressions and there is
still enough of the surroundings to see where they are.
Tina
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 1:35 PM, philippe.amard <philippe.amard@xxxxxx>wrote:
> I was in Paris last Saturday and had to get to the drugstore near my
> daughter's place.
>
> I found this friendly pair among endangered species deserved
> "immortality" and asked them if I could take a snap, which they
> spontaneously agreed to.
>
> So my question now is which one do you think works better if either
> does. And why svp.
>
> a)
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/d/370977-1/Paris-Hardware+Store+2-4113.jpg
>
> or b)
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/d/370973-1/Paris-Hardware+Store+3-4114.jpg
>
> Thank you in anticipation.
>
> Philippe
>
>
> One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible
> to the eye. Antoine de Saint Exupéry in Le Petit Prince.
> NO ARCHIVE
>
>
>
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
>
--
Tina Manley
http:// <http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com/>www.tinamanley.com
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
