Thanks, Moose, Ken and Brian. I went back and reworked the first one
that I had posted in another gallery (cropped), and I agree. At some
time I had pushed a couple of sliders too far to the right, and saved
the setting. That has now been corrected, but I have not reworked the
ones in the Zone 10 Gallery.
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
On 10/23/2013 5:18 PM, Moose wrote:
> On 10/23/2013 9:33 AM, Ken Norton wrote:
>>> So. ... you used a recently new camera for those three shots, but they do
>>> not display well on
>>> my computer set-up, at either the small size or the large size. They are in
>>> focus, and not
>>> blurred by shake, but, they look for all the world like scans of
>>> transparencies which have not
>>> gone all that well. I can't put my finger on what might have caused this,
>>> and wonder if there's
>>> something in your post-processing procedure that has gone astray?
>>> As far as I can see it's not what I would expect from over-sharpening, but
>>> maybe it is?
>> It looks like too much shadow recovery to me. Or the clarity slider got
>> bumped.
> Yup, just about to comment "Over processed" myself. Esp. the first one.
>
> Bug Eyed Moose
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|