> Hum . . . Interesting exercise, but not much more than that, IMHO. If he
> wasn't a Nat Geo shooter, no one would pay attention. Phones can be very
> creative devices, photo wise, but I think they represent a case where they
> are an auxiliary device, not a primary device. Each of this guy's pictures
> would have been much, much better done with proper kit. Who the f--- goes to
> Fingal's Cave and tries to shoot it with a freaking fone? Blech!!
I wouldn't care if he/she used charcoal and paper, as long as the
article is compelling. It is unfortunate that the NG seems to lack
compelling articles in 2/3 of the issues. But I still subscribe for
the 1/3.
--
Ken Norton
ken@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.zone-10.com
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|