Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Moose Arrives In Maine - Locals Amazed

Subject: Re: [OM] Moose Arrives In Maine - Locals Amazed
From: DZDub <jdubikins@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 09:53:10 -0500
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 5:25 PM, <usher99@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> It is relevant to any listee using OM
> 5D (c, II, or III) as digital back for OM macro lenses or indeed on OM
> as I plan to do.
>

Relevance acknowledged.  Paying attention.


> A bit more investigation shows that at pixel width "p", angular
> velocity of cam w, one pixel blur should occur at shutter speed of p/(f
> *w). No?
> Thus shutter speed required for a given blur is proportional to 1/f
> where f is the focal length. Magnification makes this more complex but f
> never drops out. Am getting to the 85% certain confidence level. This
> is either correct or not , there is no in between.
>

Could you plug in some numbers maybe?  An example would help me.  Are you
proving the old rule that a "safe" shutter speed is 1/f, refining it, or
disproving it?

Thanks.

Joel W.
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz