All are very nice within their size domain.
Chuck Norcutt
On 9/13/2013 5:09 PM, Moose wrote:
> On 9/13/2013 11:27 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
>> Lovely, Bob! A "bourgeois concept" indeed . . .
>>
>> Actually, we all like sharpness, in the right place, it's just that we don't
>> know Moose sharpness.
>
> When it's sharp, it should be sharp. :-) My new to me M.Z 60/2.8 Macro lens
> arrived from KEH. Way too much stuff to do
> before heading for New England for a month, so I've hardly used it. I expect
> to have plenty of opportunities on the trip.
>
> Here's a little comparison of it to my primary recent means of 'getting
> close'.
> <http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=8362>Doing 1:1 hand held is
> problematic, so the 60/2.8 shot is on a tripod,
> the others hand held.
>
> Assuming both frames are magnified to the same display size, 1:1 on 4/3
> covers the equivalent subject area of 2:1 on FF.
> So this is pretty darn close. ;-)
>
> The flowers are Cape Honeysuckle, about 5 cm from base to tip of the
> reproductive* parts. The pads on the tip of the
> stamens are about 4 mm long, so they are MUCH larger than life size on screen
> in the 100% crop.
>
> At 1:1, focusing is easier with a focusing rail, so one just went in the pile
> of things for our trip.
>
> Speaking of sharp, this is the first µ4/3 lens I've used where I can see a
> clear deterioration of detail @ 100%, moving
> from f11 to f16.
>
> Tacky Moose
>
> * Naughty bits. **
>
> ** sexy parts.
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|