On 9/11/2013 1:09 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
>> I may have forgotten some wonderful aspect, beyond looks, cachet, etc., but
>> it's really a specialist/niche model to me.
> The sound. It sounds different than any other OM. There is just
> something special about this camera that goes far behind the
> specifications. It's funny, because I know the OM-4T is a "better"
> camera for a lot of what I do (aperture prefire, auto mode, etc), but
> the OM-3Ti is the camera I prefer to grab instead. The 3Ti is always
> loaded with film and ready to go; the OM-4T may sit empty until I
> decide to put film in it once a roll is completed.
>
> When doing a hike, it's the OM-3Ti which goes with me at least 75% of
> the time. If it's B&W film, it lives in the OM-3Ti.
I believe we are all clear about your relationship with the 3-Ti. OTOH, yours
are the only paeans of praise for it here
that include active use in the present. I'm very happy for you, but you are an
outlier and Vic's question was why more
folks weren't eager to buy one from him.
Clarificatory Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|