On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Chuck Norcutt <
chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What Moose said. I moved to the EM-5 specifically to avoid large and
> heavy camera bodies and also the blunderbuss f/2.8 lenses.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
I, too, enjoy the small size and light weight. But part of what I shoot is
concerts from time to time and for that, I need a fast lens, which is why
I'm looking at one of the OM 100/2.8's which will give me 200mm equiv or
maybe something bigger, like 200mm or 300mm. That's also why I'm looking
at the HLD-6, since the big old glass really feels front-heavy on that
little E-M5 body.
However, for most of what I'm doing, either the 12-50 kit lens or that
Panny 20/1.7 is keeping me happy and shooting.
--
Paul Braun WD9GCO
Music Junkie
"Music washes from the soul the dust of everyday life." -- Harlan Howard
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|