Aren't those called craters, Chuck? ;^)
Charlie
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Chuck Norcutt <
chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Strange. The larger 2755x2066 images (which are only displaying at
> about 50% size on my screen) make the moon appear as though it's covered
> by teeny-tiny pock marks. I assume this is some sort of digital noise
> or artifacts from display conversions. Do you see that in your
> originals, either the full resolution image or the 5+ MP JPEG image that
> you uploaded?
>
> Actually, I just realized that what I'm seeing at 2755x2066 must be a
> 1:1 crop out of the full frame. At 600mm (300 + 2X converter) the image
> size of the moon is only about 1/4 of the 4/3 frame height. Maybe ACR
> can remove that "noise" in its noise removal step... the one where
> you're told to review at 100% or greater.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 8/21/2013 10:41 PM, Johnie Stafford wrote:
> > Persistence did pay off later in the evening. The clouds cleared enough
> to
> > get some shots. It wasn't as sharp as I had hoped, but such is the
> > atmosphere in Texas in August. Maybe a December or January full moon
> will be
> > clearer.
> >
> > http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=7886
> >
> > Johnie Stafford
> > McKinney, TX
> > jms@xxxxxxxxx
> > twitter <http://www.twitter.com/JohnieStafford> | LinkedIn
> > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/johniestafford>
> >
> >
> >
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|