Subject: | Re: [OM] OM-D E-M1 |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 15 Aug 2013 08:57:55 -0400 |
I commented the other day that owning an E-M5 has not yet convinced me to sell the 5D. That is only partially that it still offers some non-overlapping functionality. And it definitely isn't superior IQ as the E-M5 is at least its equal. Mostly it's that I still do not handle the E-M5 as comfortably as the 5D. Operating its controls is still far from second nature. I find that operating the rear control wheel is awkward for a left-eyed shooter as is reaching the play back button (which would have been my choice for a focus button if it weren't so hard to reach). If I anticipate I'll have plenty of time to take a shot (usually) I'll take the E-M5. If I expect I'll be shooting people and may have to shoot quickly and/or use fill flash I'll take the 5D. Chuck Norcutt On 8/14/2013 10:36 PM, Moose wrote: > Absent the desire to use legacy MF lenses or a super shallow DOF style, I can't see where FF buys anything for most users. > Unburdened Moose -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] IMG: More water sprites, Paul Braun |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OM-D E-M1, Ken Norton |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM-D E-M1, Bob Whitmire |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM-D E-M1, Ken Norton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |