Subject: | Re: [OM] 80, 38, and 20 macro lenses |
---|---|
From: | Chris Trask <christrask@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 18 Jul 2013 06:28:15 -0700 (GMT-07:00) |
> >Oeps forgot the link (of the first one): < >http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=5847> > >2013/7/18 Frank Wijsmuller <wijsmuller@xxxxxxxxx> > >> The dragonfly pictures on green are with the 135mm with extension tube on >> E-M5. The extension tube was attached to a small tripod, but I didn't use >> it for all pictures. Had to follow the dragonflys as they are quite easily >> disturbed and manual focus is a challenge. But some shots turned out well. >> >> Now I wonder why the auto macro's are so benifical on digital, as I end up >> with stop-down metering with my OM's on a digital body? Do you use adapter >> rings that doesn't stop down? > Nice, sharp photo. I can sympathise with the difficulty of such photos when the subject is easily spooked. Chris -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 80, 38, and 20 macro lenses, Frank Wijsmuller |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] The Olympus OM4/OM4TI prevents exposures after frame 36, Vick Ko |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 80, 38, and 20 macro lenses, Chris Trask |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Travel Photo Winners, Tina Manley |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |