Ken
Thanks for that essay. I have long found it difficult to work out which to
use, lapsing to aRGB for its wider gamut.
However, I accept yours and CH's opinion on this and will work in sRGB. I
don't think that I will ever find it a problem looking for microcontrast . . .
;-)
Chris
On 10 Jun 2013, at 15:54, Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
snip
> Since nearly 100% of my usage is sRGB, I see no value to using aRGB,
> expect in extremely rare circumstances where I'm struggling with an
> image and can't get the subtle color transitions (microcontrast) that
> I'm seeking. But then the fun part is converting back to sRGB for
> output. At this stage, there is a huge loss of data. Data loss which
> never occurs when working exclusively in sRGB.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|