Subject: | Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 22: testing / the X-Pro 1 lands in Alicante |
---|---|
From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 6 Jun 2013 08:13:20 -0600 |
The RAW vs. JPEG debate rages on, I see. I'll say this aobut the Fujis. Fuji is really nailing it with their in-camera processing and I can see that it just might satisfy my 80% rule. I could use in-camera JPEG at least 80% of the time, if not more. -- Ken Norton ken@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.zone-10.com -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Imagescience Computer Recommendation, Ken Norton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 1/6/2013: waiting, Bob Whitmire |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 22: testing / the X-Pro 1 lands in Alicante, SwissPace |
Next by Thread: | [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 22: testing / the X-Pro 1 lands in Alicante, usher99 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |