Subject: | Re: [OM] Diffraction distraction continued |
---|---|
From: | Mike Lazzari <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 31 May 2013 09:00:39 -0700 |
> diffraction blurring is not to be worried about in most cases. In my experience anything beyond f16 is to be avoided if possible. Kinda hard to avoid with macro. Sometimes the tradeoff is worth it though. Why else did they put f45 on the 135 macro?? -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] WOW!, Bob Adler |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OT PC backup programs, Jez Cunningham |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Diffraction distraction continued, Chuck Norcutt |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Diffraction distraction continued, Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |