On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Thank you, Brian. I am a constant disappointment to Ag Schnoz, I know,
> but
> > what defines an essential Zuiko to me currently is whether it deserves
> its
> > own Big_IS OM to EOS adapter or not, and the 300/4.5 is such a one.
>
> The only disappointment is in my own imaging performance as I try to
> keep up with your skills. It's so bad that I'm giving up and moving
> west.
>
> Don't let Joel fool you guys. He's also pretty skilled at manually
> focusing these big honkin lenses on little Olympus E-bodies without
> any form of focus confirmation.
>
Thank you, Ken, but it's been so long since I've done a Zuiko on an
E-thingie that I have serious doubts.
Joel W.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|