Subject: | Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 28/4/2013: film is not dead |
---|---|
From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 02 May 2013 12:59:01 -0700 |
On 5/2/2013 12:41 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote: > All of my cameras must still be juveniles. None of them has grown a > bellows yet. :-) None of mine can manage more than a little beep. Bellowing Moose -- What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about? -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] LR vs. Aperture image sizes [was LR5 beta}, Moose |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] LR vs. Aperture image sizes [was LR5 beta}, Paul Braun |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 28/4/2013: film is not dead, Chuck Norcutt |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 28/4/2013: film is not dead, Andrew Fildes |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |