I've been trying the E-PM1 and Panny 14-42 X lens instead of the Canon S100.
Here's a gallery of images of a pretty wide range of subjects, focal lengths,
distances, light, etc. All but two taken
with the 14-42 X, and those with the Panny 20/1.7 compact lens.
<http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=4105>
I've yet to do a direct comparison with the S100; I seem to prefer making
images to testing. :-) I keep telling myself
I'll do it, so it may happen.
Compact Moose
On 3/17/2013 6:48 PM, Moose wrote:
> On 3/16/2013 11:45 PM, Moose wrote:
>
>> ... whatever is driving Moose's Pen experiment has resulted in E-PM1 and
>> Panny 14-42 X lens arriving from different
>> original owners (along with the 15/8 'lens cap' lens)
>>
>> The combination won't quite fit in my old belt case, but it's more due to
>> different shape than overall size. An
>> interesting discovery, for someone taking the kind of trips you guys do, is
>> that it fits quite nicely in an OtterBox
>> 2500. So it could be perfectly safe and dry while rappelling down
>> waterfalls, crossing streams at a gallop, and so
>> on. :-)
>>
>> AND, should one, like the Moose, happen to have the Panny 20/1.7, both
>> lenses fit cozily in the OtterBox, one on the
>> camera, and one beside the lens on the camera. This would be a great combo
>> of IQ, focal range and speed for anyplace
>> wet and/or dangerous where a more capable camera lens kit isn't practical.
>
> Her are some physical comparison images of G11, E-PM1 with Panny 14-42X and
> E-PL2 with Panny 20/1.7.
> <http://galleries.moosemystic.net/MooseFoto/index.php?gallery=Tech/Oly_Pens>
> ...
>
> Illustrative Moose
>
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|