Since the images are from an Olympus, I'm interested to see how it looks
when processed on Viewer 2 with minimum adjustment. My experiences with
Viewer 2 have been mostly good.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Thanks, yes, that and several others need some work. I'm not sure what
> happened with that one. Some had exposure errors and needed a lot of
> bit bending but that one is fair looking in raw form with just slight
> overexposure.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> On 3/28/2013 10:30 PM, C.H.Ling wrote:
>> Chuck, there are many beautiful sceneries and you have captured them very
>> nicely!
>>
>> I have a feeling that a few of them could use more contrast. I played a
>> little with the first image:
>>
>> http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/dunfermline%20img_8157e_stda.jpg
>>
>> BTW, I prefer a lower JPEG compression for these detailed sceneries.
>>
>> C.H.Ling
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
