They seem to have come out fine, Chuck. And the drivers probably had fun, but
wasn't watching it just a bit boring? They're just going round and round
making a noise, after all.
Chris
On 26 Mar 2013, at 14:21, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> OK, I wasn't even going to bother processing these but here are a few
> that I considered OK shots with emphasis on the first which is a pano of
> the East Bay Raceway from where I was sitting
> <http://www.chucknorcutt.com/East%20Bay%20Raceway%20-%20OK/east%20bay%20raceway%20park%20-%20pano38-43.htm>
> and here are the rest of the OK group
> <http://www.chucknorcutt.com/East%20Bay%20Raceway%20-%20OK/>
>
> US residents might want to pay attention to the phone icon and phone
> number on this T-shirt on the guy in front of me. I couldn't help but
> ask and, yes, it's a reproduction from the 60s.
> <http://www.chucknorcutt.com/East%20Bay%20Raceway%20-%20OK/p3230368e.htm>
>
> And here are some flubs.
> <http://www.chucknorcutt.com/East%20Bay%20Raceway%20-%20Flubs/index.htm>
> I think the first two are focus errors and the others are probably
> motion blur from slow shutter despite high ISO.
>
> But recall that the main point of all of this was that the camera is
> capable of delivering a well focused shot even though the EVF may itself
> be blurred by motion at the moment of exposure.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|