Hi Chuck,
It was breezy and in motion (on EVERY frame!). I found it distracting in
this case though often I think movement adds a quality of life to this kind
of image (e.g.,
http://www.rgaphoto.com/benches/content/MonoBench-2_large.html ). Just
didn't work for me here. Horses for courses.
Thanks again for your help as I worked through this one.
Best,
Bob
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 3:44 AM, Chuck Norcutt <
chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I preferred the composition with the blue flower in the foreground but,
> on closer inspection (even at this small size), it appears that the blue
> flower is either out of focus or blurred by motion.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 3/23/2013 11:10 PM, Robert Adler wrote:
> > Once again, with the incredible help of Ted Grant, this image has
> morphed.
> > Ted's suggestions took it from an "OK, nice..." to a real nice image.
> > Slowly we get there, from Don to Ted: what great forums!
> >
> http://www.rgaphoto.com/sierras/content/Pano-HitePano1-HiteCove-6x6-MASTERCF000666_large.html
> > Hope you like better :-)
> > Bob
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Robert Adler <rgacpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks Mike. The camera wasn't vertically level: the hill was too steep
> >> for that. And 50mm in 6x4.5 medium format is probably a bit different
> than
> >> your 50 (which in theory may make the tilt even more extreme?).
> >> Tilt ain't easy no matter the format: Even with 4x5 I remember that I
> >> would just crank up the f-stop to be sure!
> >> Thanks for looking.
> >> Best,
> >> Bob
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 4:17 PM, <usher99@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Very much worth the effort.
> >>> Very nice shot--I do like the crop. Curious about the choice of tilt.
> >>> 7deg tilt for 50mm lens would be "optimum" for perpendicular distance
> >>> form lens to focal plane (assumes level cam)
> >>> to be about 15 inches from my tables that I often regret ignoring.
> >>> There were also vertical elements rather close and you mentioned a
> >>> steep slope.
> >>>
> >>> I occasionally use my Mirex t-s adapter for OM on OM or Canyon but it
> >>> is a difficult process (for me) to get things correct. Even with the
> >>> Imax OM VF's it is nice to be able to magnify things.
> >>>
> >>> Tilted Mike
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>> Oh yes, techie stuff: Alpa MAX with a 50mm Rodegon in portrait
> >>>> orientation, 7 degress lens tilt, ISO 50, polarizing filter, 1/125, 3
> >>>> blended images (shifted 10 deg left, center and 10deg right). Phase
> >>> One
> >>>> IQ160. That's a lot for some freaking flowers that I could have lost
> >>> it all
> >>>> for!
> >>> --
> >>> _________________________________________________________________
> >>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> >>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> >>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Bob Adler
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
Bob Adler
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|