>
>All this talk about the e-m5 with 1.2/50mm triggered me to take this
>combination with me on a late walk.
>
>Some non elaborate verified observations:
>- @ 1.2 it is really soft, @ 2.0 still not too sharp, so these swan shots
>were @ 4.0 if I remember correctly
>- in some more light focus is easily achieved, even more when using the
>pseudo focus peaking
>- but in the darkness, I primarily used magnification
>- the handling is still quite OK, although the focus ring is slightly more
>away from the body then where I expected it to be
>- my wife is not very good at imitating the sound of bread, since they
>wouldn't swim towards us which would have made a considerable nicer picture
>;-(
>
>Now which one to delete?
>
><http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=3186>
>
I like Swans-2.jpg better for the composition of the two swans
side-by-side, though the sharpness of the nearer swan in Swans-1.jpg is more
pleasing from a focus standpoint. I wonder how using a low-power flash would
alter the colour of the swans and the far shoreline?
Chris
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|