Subject: | Re: [OM] Sex Photography |
---|---|
From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 28 Feb 2013 08:45:49 -0600 |
> Maybe because he was afraid to ask the actual participants for permission > to photograph them? That's what it sounds like. He just used some of his > friends as stand-ins. Somebody snitched on him. I agree that the photos > were totally underwhelming snapshots that could have been made anywhere. So, in other words: Stock Photography. A collection of staged images for stock are not news. This guy mailed it in. I do find it entertaining that it failed to reach CNN's standards. You mean they have standards? -- Ken Norton ken@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.zone-10.com -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] "Olympus Has Fallen", William Sommerwerck |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] A new Tope suggestion? (was "Ummmm..."), Ken Norton |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Sex Photography, Tina Manley |
Next by Thread: | [OM] IMGS: Babies, Tina Manley |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |