One thing you have to understand about His Mooseness is that his eyes already
do what our clarity sliders do, and his eyes do it better. If Moose says it
seems over sharpened to him, then you can figure it's just about right--unless,
of course, he says he's already corrected for his vision. The same is often
true about tonal values. He sees stuff the rest of us can't see. Until he
Moosefies our pictures. Then we can see it. Sometimes. Mrs. Moose wants to buy
him glasses that soften his vision so he will see like the rest of we mortals.
I have offered to chip in. <g>
Four-eyed Bob
On Feb 13, 2013, at 8:49 PM, Tina Manley wrote:
> And I thought the tree trunk looked too sharp and overly emphasized so I
> used a negative clarity brush on it.
>
> Tina
>
> On Wednesday, February 13, 2013, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 2/13/2013 5:38 AM, Tina Manley wrote:
>>> PESO:
>>>
>>> Just a village in rural Honduras, Nueva Frontera:
>>>
>>> http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/148765429
>>
>> As usual, as as others have said, a perfectly wonderful composition with
> perfect people.
>>
>> But ... there's something whack (technical term) with the middle
> tones.Seems like the midpoint is in the wrong place,
>> and/or mid-tone contrast is too flat, something. Anyway, the curve is
> off. Look at the tree trunk. The partially
>> stripped bark should have more texture, tension, contrast, depth ...
>>
>> I messed with it a little, but it wasn't happening.
>>
>> Confabulated Moose
>>
>> --
>> What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|