Subject: | Re: [OM] Twilight [was Moon, Cloud, Sunset Light] |
---|---|
From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 08 Feb 2013 17:41:54 -0800 |
On 2/4/2013 9:03 PM, DZDub wrote: > ... > Still, I've been there before, and will be again, and I'm quite happy with > the single exposure I took that day. > <http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=2059> > > This one is quite a bit nicer at full size, though a number of the branches > look jaggy in a digital rather than a natural way. Is it just my equipment > (or my imagination)? Aaaargh! Sometimes I despair of showing fine detail in nature on the web. That one snag, in particular, seems to be at just the right angle and thinness to cause trouble. Sloppy eyes let it get by. I've posted a 2048 wide version now. It's better full size than before, although about the same at 900. Exasperated Moose -- What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about? -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Paul's PAW - new stuff up, Paul Braun |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Oh, Gallery master...., Ken Norton |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Twilight [was Moon, Cloud, Sunset Light], DZDub |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Twilight [was Moon, Cloud, Sunset Light], DZDub |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |