Re: [OM] Awww, poop.

[Chuck Norcutt]

Uh, oh.  I'll have to check mine.  I've had it for many years and it has 
always remained clear.  I assumed I had the exceptional case.  But I 
haven't looked lately and will have to check again when I get home.

Chuck Norcutt


On 2/4/2013 12:49 AM, Paul Braun wrote:
> After seeing the mention of hazing on the middle element of the OM
> 65-200, I looked at mine.
>
> Dammit.
>
> That was one of the lenses I had hoped to use with the E-M5.  Now I know
> why my test shots were all very low contrast. I hadn't heard of that
> problem before.  That lens served me well during the "film years".
>
> Oh, well.  Guess it goes on the pile of useless camera stuff and I have
> to start looking for something to replace that range.   I have the
> 75-150 which I can use, but it's not quite as long.  Neither one were
> speed demons.
>
> It's always something, innit?
>
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/