I agree. Both look great to me!
Tina
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 12:19 PM, DZDub <jdubikins@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:40 AM, David Young <dsy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > My big beef is with the follow-focus or tracking mode in the E-M5. So,
> > here
> > are two shots... the first shows a crash, caught with the E3. The second
> > shows
> > a crash caught with the E-M5. As you can see, although both cameras
> were
> > in
> > tracking mode, the E-M5 would not lock up focus until the crash was
> nearly
> > over.
> >
> > http://www.furnfeather.net/Temps/Stake_2011-13.html
> >
> > The second set simply illustrates the abilities of the E3 to focus
> through
> > snow
> > (it doesn't always work) and to track the moving bikes. The tracking
> focus
> > mode
> > in the E3 worked particularly well tracking the bikes in the second, or
> > "swishy
> > pan" shot, until the moment was just right.
> >
> > http://www.furnfeather.net/Temps/Stake_2011-12.html
>
>
> Both excellent shots. I'll have to take your word on the superiority of one
> camera over the other. The photos don't give anything away.
>
> Joel W.
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
>
--
Tina Manley, ASMP
www.tinamanley.com
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|