It was only 30 seconds, F3.2, iso 400. wide angle lens.
On Tuesday, January 29, 2013, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> I've been puzzling over how this shot was done
> <http://www.naturephotoblog.com/index.php?showimage=324>
> It's clearly a very long night exposure in order to show a blue sky and
> significant color in many of the stars. But despite the lengthy
> exposure there are no star trails. That means the exposure was guided
> on an equatorial mount. But the would be contra-indicated by the fact
> that the rocks do not display any motion blurring. The rocks are
> clearly lit by flash but I believe the sky exposure was so long as to
> leave ghost images of the stationery rocks. But not ghosts are seen.
>
> Conclusion. Photoshop of two images.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 1/29/2013 12:09 PM, Brian Swale wrote:
> > The covering blurb says 15 photographers, but I think there could be
> close
> > to 1000 shots.
> > Well worth a look.
> >
> > Use the LEFT arrow from the top link
> > http://www.naturephotoblog.com/
> > http://www.naturephotoblog.com/index.php?x=about
> >
> > Brian Swale.
> >
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
Ken Norton
ken@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.zone-10.com
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|