On 1/22/2013 4:01 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
>> As I already have 9-300 mm (18-600, FF eq.) coverage with native µ4/3
>> lenses, not of much practical use for me.
> Agreed. But there are a few of us still chiseling on stones.
And should one ever be made for OM mount, who knows what it will do to the
special characters of the lenses.
What if a 35-80 microed for NEX becomes just ordinary - or worse, in those
intangibles so important to you!
Doubting Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|