> I think the EM-5 deserves its first place. I wouldn't be surprised if it,
> like the OM-1 once, will be a benchmark for small yet very capable
> cameras. For many people, it represents a better compromise than
> a larger DSLR.
> IMHO, the best camera is about the best compromise, not about
> absolute quality. Of course, I'm prejudiced, since I have one. And
> it makes me smile every time I use it.
It's good Olympus is returning to its roots, trying to pare down the size of
DSLRs. If I weren't committed to Canon EOS, I'd seriously consider buying an
OM-D body. My only complaint is that it's badly proportioned (a polite way of
saying "ugly").
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|