But despite the large image count the resolution of your HDTV is only
2MP. Make a print of the same size at 300 dpi from a large sensor
camera and get close. There is a difference.
Chuck Norcutt
On 1/2/2013 12:15 AM, Paul Braun wrote:
> On 1/1/13 22:14 : , Scott Gomez wrote:
>> No kidding, Chuck. And what's more, this tablet does the stitching without
>> an additional app. Just point, click, sweep across the desired area, and
>> click for 'done'.
>>
>> ---
>> Scott
>> On Jan 1, 2013 7:47 PM, "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Imagine. The time is 1972. How'd you take that picture? I held my
>>> computer up in front of me, took a bunch of pictures and "stitched" them
>>> together. Yeah, right!
>>>
>>>
>
> My iPhone can do the "sweep across the scene thing" now as well.
> However, it's one level of pano. That Autostitch app that I use can do
> as many rows and columns as you can fit (I think the limit is around 37
> or so separate images). I've used it to create superwide and supertall
> images before, and it's addicting.
>
> This afternoon I brought up both images - the I&M Canal Aqueduct - on
> the BATV in the living room. There, in hi-def, on the 60" Sony, I
> really couldn't tell much of a difference between the pano generated
> in-phone by Autostitch and the one I created by tossing the same raw
> images at Hugin on the iMac. That blows my mind. A $2 app running on a
> freaking' cell phone can make pretty seamless panos that look as good as
> ones generated by tons more computing power.
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|