Moose's post was a little confusing on the reputation of the 20/1.7. When I
had one with my GF1, then E-PL2, it worked extremely well.
I sold it because I was getting out of µ43 cameras; I now have a Fuji X100 from
which I am hoping to gain results similar to the GF1/20 combination.
Chris
On 30 Dec 2012, at 06:21, "C.H.Ling" <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> All I heard the 20/1.7 is a great lens, I was considering it as part of my
> future 4/3 lens set (together with the 12/2) so that I can repeat the same
> configuration like I use my 5D II wth OM 24/2 and 40/2. I don't think the
> 20/1.7 is so poor that the difference can be seen from web size image.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|