I think it looks pretty good but since Moose probably isn't here to tell
you I'll assume the role to tell you the red channel is a bit blown on
this image. (check the levels function in Fast Stone and select the red
channel) The JPEG that Jim sent is also slightly blown but your editing
has made it a bit worse. Unfortunately, you can't pull it back from a
JPEG as you could likely do from the raw file. Fast Stone can convert
raw files but gives you no control over the conversion process and
essentially recreates something close to the camera's JPEG. Therefore,
no advantage to processing raw files in Fast Stone. Strangely the
original JPEG also exhibits some posterization in the low end of the red
channel... as though some heavy 8 bit editing had already been done on
it. I don't know why that should be.
Well, just like Tina's image where I "complained" of blown highlights I
like the image just as I liked hers. But I think starting from a raw
file editor like ACR it could be even a little bit better.
Chuck Norcutt
On 12/7/2012 3:46 PM, Brian Swale wrote:
> Jim Nichols showed us, a few days ago, a couple of images of Poinsettia
> he had prepared using Adobe products.
>
> I wondered how FS would handle this topic, so asked Jim if he would send
> me a 1000 pixel-wide jpg file straight from his RAW file with no editing at
> his
> end.
>
> I was delighted when he agreed, so I did a quick test.
>
> I think it's worth sharing, so here it is for a few days:
>
> http://www.brianswale.com/temp/
>
> What do you think of the abilities of FS in my hands?
>
> Brian Swale
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|