Chuck
Thanks for your opinion, and for that link (which I look at this evening, after
work). But using less energy has always been my main aim: I hate the idea of
profligate use of energy.
And fracking seems to be a profligate use of energy, never mind the tendency to
cause quakes.
Chris
On 29 Nov 2012, at 00:23, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> But, denier or worrier, the fact that Britain produces only a small
> fraction of the earth's anthropogenically produced CO2 while the US (and
> especially now China) produce the bulk of it makes me call you
> financially impractical. Even if all of Britain did what you're doing
> it wouldn't make the slightest bit of difference. The entire world will
> have to reduce total energy consumption by about 80% in order to make a
> dent in the (assumed) temperature by the time the silly (and never
> proven correct) computer models predict fire and brimstone.
>
> Britain will probably be flooded before long with low cost gas from
> fracking. Before you spend a lot of money on other than a gas heating
> device I urge you to read this (I've even found Amazon UK for you)
> <http://www.amazon.co.uk/Illusion-Climategate-Corruption-Science-Independent/dp/1906768358/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1354147855&sr=1-1>
>
> You'll probably end up knowing much more than you want to about
> Principal Components Analysis but otherwise is not terribly
> mathematical. Montford is an exellent author and detective. If you're
> ill by the time you finish it I'll not be surprised.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|