Those have come out well, Martin. For some reason the inside shot with the Oly
cap lying on the book is quite evocative for me. Perhaps I miss OM days . . .
Chris
On 28 Nov 2012, at 02:07, Martin Walters <mwalters@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This afternoon, I went to one of our local reserves with the OM-D, the
> 12-50 and the OM 100/2 with the MF-2 adapter. I've added 12 photos -
> JPGs straight out of the camera. Some of them could use some adjustment.
> EXIF data have been added. Metering is centre-weighted and IS was on for
> both lenses.
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/14675507@N08/sets/72157632098488268/
>
> I found I could focus the 100 in good light, without magnifying,
> provided there was sufficient contrast. Other times I used the magnify
> function at 5X. The 100 is about the same size as the 12-50 but quite a
> bit heavier. I think the grip would help a bit.
>
> I don't have a shade for the 12-50 yet, but still didn't see any obvious
> flare, which is good.
>
> Looking a the bright setting sun through trees caused the EVF to
> degrade somewhat (blooming?). Still worked, but didn't look too good.
>
> There are a couple more taken inside in low light.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|