> Ektachrome does seem much easier than Kodachrome! The Kodachrome is
> supposed to be more archival but these Ektachromes haven't faded a bit in
> 17 years.
I've had some of my Fujichromes from the late '80s do a little bit of
fading, but so far they've been totally recoverable during the
scanning and editing process. In the case of my F50/F100 slides, they
are starting to take on the look of a little bit of overexposure.
Nothing serious, yet. But it does point to the fact that I do need to
buckle down and digitally archive the selects sooner than later. No
need to scan the entire library of 30K+ slides, just the good stuff.
Hmm. Something to have my offspring do until the darkroom is
operational. (hoping to make a dent on that this weekend).
AG
--
Ken Norton
ken@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.zone-10.com
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|