I tend to concur with Schozz.
I like AA's work as is, and I hate the too many attempts made to copy
it. Pretty boring in fact those are.
I'm sure there's a way to get these rivers, peaks, dome right, albeit
differently, by forgetting AA and using one's own eye and gear
capabilites. Am I so weird when I say so?
OTT: Who is this Walt you're referring to? Walt J ?
Amitiés
Philippe
Le 20 nov. 12 à 21:37, Chuck Norcutt a écrit :
> Given the lighting conditions it had to be my own interpretation.
> It's
> a horizontal/vertical panorama taken at 200mm on the 5D. Lots of
> detail
> but it also has several stitching errors I hadn't noticed at first.
> One
> of these days I'll try restitching it with CS6 or with Hugin if that
> doesn't work. Once I get it stitched properly I'll also try a B&W
> conversion. It will probably still be lifeless. :-)
>
> ps: The foreground looks much different than in AA's day.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 11/20/2012 11:17 AM, Ken Norton wrote:
>>> I'm embarrassed whenever I see Ansel's photo of the Snake River
>>> below
>>> the Grand Tetons. I stood on that same spot and mafr my own
>>> photo... at
>>> 2pm in full sun with no clouds... call it lifeless. :-) Of
>>> course, I
>>> didn't have three weeks to wait for the right time and right
>>> weather.
>>
>> Excuses, excuses.
>>
>> Seriously! If you want an AA picture buy an AA picture. Come up with
>> YOUR OWN interpretation.
>>
>> AG (I miss Walt) Schnozz
>>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|