Subject: | Re: [OM] Art |
---|---|
From: | Frank Wijsmuller <wijsmuller@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 15 Nov 2012 12:11:42 +0100 |
I'm strongly with Moose here. Probably most paintings before 1850 then would not classify as art, because there was just the intention of making an image of some kind and painting was the only way they had... Rembrandt was a commissioned portrait photographer without a camera. A gifted strobist without flash ;-) Best, Frank 2012/11/15 Moose > > > > You can create art only when it’s your intention to do so. > > Bosh! -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] IMG: In a few lines, philippe.amard |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] LensRentals.com - Lensrentals Repair Data: January - July 2012, John Hermanson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Art, Moose |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Art, Ken Norton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |